<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Community Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecommunityword.com/online/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Fighting Attacks Social Security by cttsp5</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/fighting-attacks-social-security/comment-page-1/#comment-6064</link>
		<dc:creator>cttsp5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2526#comment-6064</guid>
		<description>The part of Social Security that needs to be fixed is the disability part.  You have alcoholics, drug addicts, bi-polar and other mental illnesses, adhd, etc. That qualify for Social Security disability.  This is vastly abused.  I know of many instances, but will mention a few. There was a household that had 4 people a lady who claimed and a doctor signed off that she was disabled, 2 alcoholics, and a drug addict.  They all collected SSI, then on the side they all worked. This lady that had a bad back did house cleaning for people. One did roofing repairs, another worked on cars. Another case is a lady who supposedly was hurt at her job by slipping and falling. She collected SSI for over 15 years, poor thing couldn&#039;t work, in great pain, couldn&#039;t even do a desk job and doctor signed off on it too. But she could be seen shopping, at the water park,lugging groceries out of her car, carrying her grandchildren; she is drawing Social Security disability and working full time at her daughter&#039;s bar.  Another example is all these students whose parents have applied for SSI because they are ADHD, bi-polar, on medicine.  They get the link card too.  This is abuse of the system and no one does anything about it, they are worried about taking it away from the elderly, most who worked all their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part of Social Security that needs to be fixed is the disability part.  You have alcoholics, drug addicts, bi-polar and other mental illnesses, adhd, etc. That qualify for Social Security disability.  This is vastly abused.  I know of many instances, but will mention a few. There was a household that had 4 people a lady who claimed and a doctor signed off that she was disabled, 2 alcoholics, and a drug addict.  They all collected SSI, then on the side they all worked. This lady that had a bad back did house cleaning for people. One did roofing repairs, another worked on cars. Another case is a lady who supposedly was hurt at her job by slipping and falling. She collected SSI for over 15 years, poor thing couldn&#8217;t work, in great pain, couldn&#8217;t even do a desk job and doctor signed off on it too. But she could be seen shopping, at the water park,lugging groceries out of her car, carrying her grandchildren; she is drawing Social Security disability and working full time at her daughter&#8217;s bar.  Another example is all these students whose parents have applied for SSI because they are ADHD, bi-polar, on medicine.  They get the link card too.  This is abuse of the system and no one does anything about it, they are worried about taking it away from the elderly, most who worked all their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Hated Roosevelt too. Remember? by davidpjordan</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/they-hated-roosevelt-too-remember/comment-page-1/#comment-6062</link>
		<dc:creator>davidpjordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2508#comment-6062</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Well, since the Democrats are almost certain to win big in 2012, we’ll never know, will we?&lt;/i&gt;

If so, then I can guarantee there will be no recovery after 2012. And if the European economy collapses, it will most certainly send us into another Great Depression. We&#039;ll need a Third World War to get out. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, since the Democrats are almost certain to win big in 2012, we’ll never know, will we?</i></p>
<p>If so, then I can guarantee there will be no recovery after 2012. And if the European economy collapses, it will most certainly send us into another Great Depression. We&#8217;ll need a Third World War to get out. <img src='http://thecommunityword.com/online/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Hated Roosevelt too. Remember? by Community Word Staff</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/they-hated-roosevelt-too-remember/comment-page-1/#comment-6061</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Word Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2508#comment-6061</guid>
		<description>DPJ said: &quot; I’ll make a prediction. If the GOP’s nominee wins the White House in 2012 and the economy recovers nicely, Dems will claim it was “Obama’s policies finally starting to work.” If the GOP wins in 2012 but our economy is brought down soon afterward by economic collapse in Europe (Italy or Spain defaults, etc.), Dems will blame “GOP economic policies.”&quot;

Well, since the Democrats are almost certain to win big in 2012, we&#039;ll never know, will we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPJ said: &#8221; I’ll make a prediction. If the GOP’s nominee wins the White House in 2012 and the economy recovers nicely, Dems will claim it was “Obama’s policies finally starting to work.” If the GOP wins in 2012 but our economy is brought down soon afterward by economic collapse in Europe (Italy or Spain defaults, etc.), Dems will blame “GOP economic policies.”&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, since the Democrats are almost certain to win big in 2012, we&#8217;ll never know, will we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Hated Roosevelt too. Remember? by davidpjordan</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/they-hated-roosevelt-too-remember/comment-page-1/#comment-6060</link>
		<dc:creator>davidpjordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2508#comment-6060</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why are you such a hater, David?&lt;/i&gt;

You forgot the smily face, Billy. 

Immediate post-war demobilization squashes your argument. The reason for the economic recovery was two-fold: (1) the New Deal ended, ushering in an era of more business-friendly policies, and (2) the devastation of traditional competitors in Europe made American industry dominant for a generation (even with higher top bracket corporate, capital gains and income taxes). Rising inflation during the 1950s or recessions in 1948-49, 1954, 1957-58 and 1960 (a mild downturn as a result of 1959 steel strike) could not stop it. 

As the baby boomers began entering the workforce in the mid-1960s (thus ending a long labor shortage), foreign industry became competitive and inflation once more reared its ugly head, American industry begin to decline. 

Since Ed Klein compared Obama with FDR, I&#039;ll make a prediction. If the GOP&#039;s nominee wins the White House in 2012 and the economy recovers nicely, Dems will claim it was &quot;Obama&#039;s policies finally starting to work.&quot; If the GOP wins in 2012 but our economy is brought down soon afterward by economic collapse in Europe (Italy or Spain defaults, etc.), Dems will blame &quot;GOP economic policies.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why are you such a hater, David?</i></p>
<p>You forgot the smily face, Billy. </p>
<p>Immediate post-war demobilization squashes your argument. The reason for the economic recovery was two-fold: (1) the New Deal ended, ushering in an era of more business-friendly policies, and (2) the devastation of traditional competitors in Europe made American industry dominant for a generation (even with higher top bracket corporate, capital gains and income taxes). Rising inflation during the 1950s or recessions in 1948-49, 1954, 1957-58 and 1960 (a mild downturn as a result of 1959 steel strike) could not stop it. </p>
<p>As the baby boomers began entering the workforce in the mid-1960s (thus ending a long labor shortage), foreign industry became competitive and inflation once more reared its ugly head, American industry begin to decline. </p>
<p>Since Ed Klein compared Obama with FDR, I&#8217;ll make a prediction. If the GOP&#8217;s nominee wins the White House in 2012 and the economy recovers nicely, Dems will claim it was &#8220;Obama&#8217;s policies finally starting to work.&#8221; If the GOP wins in 2012 but our economy is brought down soon afterward by economic collapse in Europe (Italy or Spain defaults, etc.), Dems will blame &#8220;GOP economic policies.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Hated Roosevelt too. Remember? by Community Word Staff</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/they-hated-roosevelt-too-remember/comment-page-1/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Word Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2508#comment-6059</guid>
		<description>Why are you such a hater, David? 

In reality, we don&#039;t know what would have happened had World War II not come along. It certainly put people to work in massive numbers, and served as a massive New Deal spending program, probably causing the massive post war recovery you mention was NOT part of the New Deal recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you such a hater, David? </p>
<p>In reality, we don&#8217;t know what would have happened had World War II not come along. It certainly put people to work in massive numbers, and served as a massive New Deal spending program, probably causing the massive post war recovery you mention was NOT part of the New Deal recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Hated Roosevelt too. Remember? by davidpjordan</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/they-hated-roosevelt-too-remember/comment-page-1/#comment-6058</link>
		<dc:creator>davidpjordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2508#comment-6058</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;unemployment rate dropped to 1.09% in 1943&lt;/i&gt;

This should be 1.9%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>unemployment rate dropped to 1.09% in 1943</i></p>
<p>This should be 1.9%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Hated Roosevelt too. Remember? by davidpjordan</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/12/02/they-hated-roosevelt-too-remember/comment-page-1/#comment-6057</link>
		<dc:creator>davidpjordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2508#comment-6057</guid>
		<description>This is utter nonsense. You can&#039;t get economic recovery by &quot;creating&quot; TEMPORARY jobs like those from CCC and WPA. And &quot;World War Two got us out of the Depression&quot; is technically true but only part of the story. 

President Roosevelt assumed office in March 1933 with nearly 25% unemployment. By 1937, this had declined to 14.3%. Yet this was hardly a recovery, considering it was 3.2% in 1929. Increased taxes on the rich (the big spenders) and &quot;excess&quot; profit taxes prevented recovery as confiscation and redistribution of wealth smothered the free market&#039;s natural creation of wealth. 

(Btw, Dems blame tightened monetary policy and spending cuts for the 1937-38 recession. In reality, action by the US Treasury to tighten gold inflows caused unemployment skyrocketed to 19%.)

During World War Two, millions of men were called to duty to fight the Axis Powers, thus freeing up jobs for the unemployed. So much so that the unemployment rate dropped to 1.09% in 1943! But the war effort meant massive budget deficits. 

So here&#039;s the rest of the story. Logically, FDR feared that when the war ended, the Great Depression would return. But his own economic policies would have ensured his fears came true. Of course, he died in April 1945. 

Although the Democrats controlled Congress at the time, a majority rejected Pres. Harry Truman&#039;s planned return to New Deal policies, cut spending (mostly military-related) as well top marginal corporate tax rates from 90 to 38%. 

Funny thing is, the US Treasury was bringing in far more revenue in 1946 with lower tax rates (because they encouraged ecomomic activity. Millions of PERMANENT jobs were ceated, and the nation enjoyed an economic boom for a generation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is utter nonsense. You can&#8217;t get economic recovery by &#8220;creating&#8221; TEMPORARY jobs like those from CCC and WPA. And &#8220;World War Two got us out of the Depression&#8221; is technically true but only part of the story. </p>
<p>President Roosevelt assumed office in March 1933 with nearly 25% unemployment. By 1937, this had declined to 14.3%. Yet this was hardly a recovery, considering it was 3.2% in 1929. Increased taxes on the rich (the big spenders) and &#8220;excess&#8221; profit taxes prevented recovery as confiscation and redistribution of wealth smothered the free market&#8217;s natural creation of wealth. </p>
<p>(Btw, Dems blame tightened monetary policy and spending cuts for the 1937-38 recession. In reality, action by the US Treasury to tighten gold inflows caused unemployment skyrocketed to 19%.)</p>
<p>During World War Two, millions of men were called to duty to fight the Axis Powers, thus freeing up jobs for the unemployed. So much so that the unemployment rate dropped to 1.09% in 1943! But the war effort meant massive budget deficits. </p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the rest of the story. Logically, FDR feared that when the war ended, the Great Depression would return. But his own economic policies would have ensured his fears came true. Of course, he died in April 1945. </p>
<p>Although the Democrats controlled Congress at the time, a majority rejected Pres. Harry Truman&#8217;s planned return to New Deal policies, cut spending (mostly military-related) as well top marginal corporate tax rates from 90 to 38%. </p>
<p>Funny thing is, the US Treasury was bringing in far more revenue in 1946 with lower tax rates (because they encouraged ecomomic activity. Millions of PERMANENT jobs were ceated, and the nation enjoyed an economic boom for a generation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poor reporting by ehopkins</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/11/11/poor-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>ehopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2429#comment-6056</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the comments about Pam Adams reporting. She is right that Methodist was in a predicament when Bryant was hired. It had just fired and sued its chief financial officer and his pals for profiting on a collection agency they set up to collect Methodist debts.
 
Bryant came in and decided Peoria needed a jump start to get more jobs so Methodist could get more patients. He founded organizations to do that, but also spent money on perks such as an expensive remodeled office and a private box at the baseball field. Greed was just redirected. 

His administration bought out the UU church for way more than it was worth, demolished it, and it&#039;s now an open space/parking lot. Another historic Peoria property building destroyed for nothing.  

As for the medical care there, luckily I have no experience with that. But a friend in for surgery twice got terrible infections both times, worse than the surgery. Let&#039;s hope they fixed that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the comments about Pam Adams reporting. She is right that Methodist was in a predicament when Bryant was hired. It had just fired and sued its chief financial officer and his pals for profiting on a collection agency they set up to collect Methodist debts.</p>
<p>Bryant came in and decided Peoria needed a jump start to get more jobs so Methodist could get more patients. He founded organizations to do that, but also spent money on perks such as an expensive remodeled office and a private box at the baseball field. Greed was just redirected. </p>
<p>His administration bought out the UU church for way more than it was worth, demolished it, and it&#8217;s now an open space/parking lot. Another historic Peoria property building destroyed for nothing.  </p>
<p>As for the medical care there, luckily I have no experience with that. But a friend in for surgery twice got terrible infections both times, worse than the surgery. Let&#8217;s hope they fixed that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Musings for September 2011 by magicdrum</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/09/07/musings-for-september-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-6053</link>
		<dc:creator>magicdrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2231#comment-6053</guid>
		<description>Yes Joanne,  a lot of people are going to miss the Peoria Theater.  I tried to get to the bad movie shows each month... but the are a little late for me.

As to yard work and reading... that is why we moved to a town house in Peoria!  I came to ask my self &quot;what did I want to do with the rest of my life?&quot;  The answer was definitely NOT &quot;yardwork&quot;... it was &quot;reading&quot;, &quot;writing&quot;, and &quot;computers&quot;.

Always look forward to seeing your Musings online.

Jeff Imig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Joanne,  a lot of people are going to miss the Peoria Theater.  I tried to get to the bad movie shows each month&#8230; but the are a little late for me.</p>
<p>As to yard work and reading&#8230; that is why we moved to a town house in Peoria!  I came to ask my self &#8220;what did I want to do with the rest of my life?&#8221;  The answer was definitely NOT &#8220;yardwork&#8221;&#8230; it was &#8220;reading&#8221;, &#8220;writing&#8221;, and &#8220;computers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Always look forward to seeing your Musings online.</p>
<p>Jeff Imig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zero Degrees of Separation: A Movie Group at Landmark’s Peoria Theater by Stella Link</title>
		<link>http://thecommunityword.com/online/blog/2011/07/13/zero-degrees-of-separation-a-movie-group-at-landmark%e2%80%99s-peoria-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-6052</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunityword.com/online/?p=2014#comment-6052</guid>
		<description>Our movie group is now at 1 pm.

The next showing on August 14th is the movie &quot;Diner&quot;. 

We just viewed &quot;Short Circuit&quot;.

Look for us on Facebook: Zero Degrees of Separation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our movie group is now at 1 pm.</p>
<p>The next showing on August 14th is the movie &#8220;Diner&#8221;. </p>
<p>We just viewed &#8220;Short Circuit&#8221;.</p>
<p>Look for us on Facebook: Zero Degrees of Separation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

